02 November 2007

Much Ado About Nothing


Sorry once again for abject crapness in keeping the blog current. For my part, the last year has gotten progressively worse, and writing about my life at the moment will only make it worse. I know how I feel; I don't need to sit here, relive my feelings and see the tragic synopsis in front of me, written in black and white. I'll leave it there and hope things get better soon...

29 September 2007

Ageing Disgracefully



Oh god. I'm thirty bloody one (it's my birthday today). I would moan about the misery that is my life at the moment (hate new job and concerned that will not get past probation period, which is on Monday; am slightly broken-hearted, resulting from complex situation that has effectively ruined a good friendship, have no money, etc etc - oh god, am even more depressed now) - I would moan about the above, but am frankly more concerned about how I will ever fit into the all-in-one hotpants ensemble I intend to wear tomorrow night to my bday celebrations. Will have to book emergency colonic tomorrow.
Two things happened tonight; one lovely and one interesting. My downstairs neighbour, M, (whom I have never met, as am never home and I am a v un-neighbourly Londoner) found me outside, smoking emergency cigarette (always, on the eve of my bday), and invited me round for (way too much) vodka and a bitching session about all men. Made me feel lots better.

Then, met I in Soho for more drinks. We were chatted up by lovely guy. To cut a long story short, we learned that we are intimidating to men (I is stunning, but I fail to see how I could have intimidated anyone tonight. I had got caught in the rain sans umbrella and was wearing an old pair of jeans I usually reserve for wearing when I'm cleaning the house). But anyway. Apparently, the way we walk into a bar spells "out of my league", and that's why no one will approach us.

You know what? I give up. Again. It's just a long, tragic descent to 40 now...

22 August 2007

Update



We've all been neglecting the blog, and we're very sorry! Facebook has kind of taken over as our favoured displacement activity. Here's a quick update from me:

P (the naughty one who never blogs) has just got married. The celebrations were fantastic - it even stopped raining for about 5 minutes - and I have only just recovered from my hangover.

I have been dating the world. I exaggerate not. Never one to do anything by halves, I am dating no less than 10 people. I have had to set up a spreadsheet to remind me who is who and when I am seeing each one. Had a minor crisis yesterday when I realised I had set up 2 dates for tomorrow night, but could not remember with whom, and would end up standing one of them up. Then I remembered that we are meant to be going out tomorrow night to celebrate L's birthday, so I couldn't make either date. I have sorted it out now, but am skating on v thin ice.
I am exhausted from it all. But I have many stories, which I shall share on the soon-to-be-launched new blog I am setting up with my (male) friend J on the dating scene. Sorry it is taking so long - it is completely J's fault and not mine, as we have agreed to write a little introductory blurb about each other, and he is refusing to write mine until he sees what I write about him. And I am too busy dating at the moment to write anything. However, I forgive him, as he kindly reassured me the other day when I went crying to him about my unrequited crush that I am indeed fanciable - when I am not being a mad, obsessive stalker. More about that some other time. And yes, this is the same crush from 3 months ago that I am STILL trying to get over, despite declaring at the time that I refused to waste 3 months obsessing.

Oh, and Love God has been calling and texting me 5 times a day. At least he was, until he discovered my friend M on the dating site. Now he is pursuing her.

My life is a soap opera.

29 July 2007

Love God: The Sequel


Love God is back on the scene. As I logged onto the dating site yesterday afternoon, his grinning face popped up onto my screen. This member wants to IM you, I was notified. I couldn’t resist.

Me: Well, well, well, if it isn’t Love God. How the hell are you?
LG: D, you sexy princess… when do I get to see you again?

We catch up on briefly on our dating experiences; I reveal only that I am nursing a bruised heart, trying in vain to prove to myself that there are plenty of other like-minded men on here I will click with, and that I am not looking for anything heavy; he tells me about the 2 failed relationships he has had since we last met. And then:

LG: So – you gonna come out and play again
Me: [in spite of self] Yeah, why not? But platonically…
LG: [clearly having not brushed up on his charm skills in the interim]: U mean I can’t undress you one day?
Me: Don’t push it, babe

Oh, what the hell? I left him my number and logged off.

24 July 2007

Spotted in the Big Apple

John Travolta. Alas, not wearing a white suit, earning money making pizzas by day, and letting it all hang out on the disco scene at night. Rather, being filmed walking in and out of a tanning salon, while hundreds of people took photos on their cell phones from behind a barrier. I didn't take a photo from behind the barrier, but probably more because I have a v crap phone that would not have been able to focus from that far away, than my own awareness of the absurdity of celebrity culture.

22 July 2007

It's a Small World


First of all, a confession: I am back on the dating website. Yes, I know I swore I’d never do it again, and I guess I can’t deny that a tiny part of me is looking… but really, I had 2 motivations for doing it:





  1. I had 38 unread messages in my inbox, which I couldn’t access unless I resubscribed, and I was curious


  2. I am really trying to move on from recent experiences and prove to myself that there are men out there who share a similar vision and purpose to their life, who have a social conscience, who don’t try to fit me in a box (or indeed a 5 bedroom home in suburban hell and try to immediately impregnate me), and with whom I can share a deep intellectual conversation, or visit an art gallery with or at least have an enjoyable coffee without one of us wanting to poke the other’s eyes out


It turns out, there are no men meeting these requirements. Although at least I am making an effort to move on.

But what is most alarming – and this is moving on from our recent discussions on related matters – is that between the dating website and Facebook, I feel as though my world is closing in on me. I recognise a lot of the people on the site as friends of friends on Facebook, and have not been able to contact some guys, as I know them to be either friends of friends I have dated, or – worse – ex-partners of friends of mine, where I know the history, and would be causing problems by getting involved.

The classic example occurred yesterday. It emerged that a guy I am meeting this afternoon (afternoon tea at Claridges, darling – for that pretentious reason alone, I know it’s never going to happen with him) knows both my sisters, and is completely mortified to have arranged a date with me (charming!). He has begged me not to tell either of them how we met – and even more alarmingly, he actually said to me that “should it become necessary in the future to disclose to them…” Eeek! I only agreed to a date, and I have made it clear I am not looking for anything other than a friend.

I have been going on a flurry of dates in the last 3 weeks in my bid to move on. I have enough material to write a book (and, oh, I probably will – some of the stories are utterly priceless). But honestly, all I want at the moment is to stay single, sociable, happy, fulfilled, and to move on!

I’ll keep you posted...

15 July 2007

Celebrating Difference, Diversity, Individuality and Equality Through the Arts


I have always been suspicious of any governmental scheme that sounds as though it is promoting spin and soundbite over substance. I have also been highly critical of the government’s policies on education. So I have never paid much attention to the “Fresh Start” scheme, which focuses on seriously underperforming state schools, where all options for improvement have been unsuccessfully exhausted. The school is closed and reopened on the same site, and is subject to reorganisational procedures.

A friend of mine is a dance teacher at one such school. Yesterday, the pupils staged a performance which she had helped to put together, and she invited me along to watch. What I saw of the performance, the school, the pupils and the dedication of the staff not only impressed me, but moved me practically to tears.

This particular school, located in an underprivileged area of central London, is a specialist arts and media school. Through the media of music, dance, drama and art, the school asserts its ethos of drawing out the potential of each child and instilling in them a thirst for learning, while bridging cultural, ethnic and religious divides. In addition to this, the school is committed to community-wide projects. These involve working with various arts foundations to benefit the pupils, as well as organising adult learning schemes in which the wider community may participate.

After being treated to Turkish dancing and African music, the main performance, incorporating music, dancing and drama, followed the title “Longing to Belong”, celebrating difference and diversity. The performers included a local group of adults with learning difficulties, and the look of pride and achievement on their faces at the end was absolutely priceless – and I am in awe of the teachers and pupils for putting the production together.

It is very easy to be “liberal” when you have the educated and economic freedom to be so inclined. It is also easy to fall for the misconception that you are worldly and open-minded just because you went to school or university with a culturally, ethnically and religiously diverse group of people. We need to be finding and supporting schemes that educate and allow everyone to live together in a mutually respectful environment. And the arts are an ideal way in which to effect this, for 2 reasons.

First, because education is about so much more than passing academic exams and going to university. It is about learning about the world around you; how each of us is a part of it, and has the ability to mould it and make a difference. It is about instilling in each individual a love of life and people and learning – and the desire to be a participating citizen. It is about realising the skills and abilities of every person and encouraging them to blossom. And this is not something that comes from memorising your times tables. A creative, extra-curricular hobby is an ideal way of teaching these values. Having the opportunity to showcase and develop creative skills is invaluable. It is complementary to the national curriculum; I know that when I took up kickboxing, I learned one of the most important lessons of my life: that anything is possible, but it takes time, perseverance, patience, dedication, belief and hard work.

Second, because, in contrast to other social and professional situations, involvement in the arts (in theory) transcends the socially-imposed barriers that divide us in the first place. In the boxing ring, the orchestra or on the stage, we are all willing participants, working together towards a common goal – what is more precious than this, and what better blueprint for living our lives can there be?

14 July 2007

Facing the Facebook (R)evolution


Who remembers life before the internet? An early convert, I remember when I lived in Paris – 10 years ago (eek!) - how frustrating it was that no one except my dad and a handful of university friends would communicate with me by e mail. I had just spent 4 months in Florida, and hated having to communicate with my American friends via a combination of a postal service that took 5 days, or pre-scheduled telephone calls.

Fast forward 10 years. The internet is now my primary form of communication. I use it for everything: for reference, research, several-times-daily communication with friends abroad; I use it to book travel and for most of my purchases: books, music, vitamins, superfoods, underwear (Myla, please, for anyone who wants to buy me a gift), men…

And then along came Facebook; the ultimate displacement activity tool for those serial procrastinators among us. I love it, and if any of you are wondering why we blog less than we used to, it’s because we’re too busy messing around on Facebook.

I don’t want to enter into any of the pretentious debates about Facebook that are currently appearing in the media over here. I think all those journalists are embarrassingly several steps behind the zeitgeist, and need to get over themselves. For god’s sake! It’s a social networking site, to be used (or not) as you wish (and most critics succumb in the end). Users have control over the content they share as well as their own privacy, and can choose to allow – or indeed block – anyone they wish into their network.

I’m also not interested in the – now dated – debate about the deterioration of communication and physical social interaction: we’re all busier now; we travel more and work longer hours; this has as much necessitated technological growth as it has resulted from the ever-developing modes of “virtual” communication. Blah blah blah – the upshot is that this is our reality now – get with it.

What I am interested in, however, is the extent to which Facebook (and to some extent, blogging) is eroding formerly rigid social barriers. Perhaps this is a specifically British concern, but as the popularity of Facebook has grown over here, any social reticence and desire for privacy we once had has started to disappear.

Some examples:

Last night, I was at a party. As I arrived, around 1am (busy weekend), I was accosted by a guy who was leaving:

“Oh – you must be D! I recognise you from your Facebook pictures! Shame we didn’t get to meet properly – A said she’d introduce us. I have to leave now, but never mind – I’ll message you on Facebook on Monday morning! Great boots you were wearing in those pictures, by the way, hahaha!”

And then this afternoon, my friend C called, to invite me to a brunch she is hosting at the end of the month. Before she hung up, she said (and I could practically hear her winking): “By the way, my friend M from Switzerland will be in London that weekend. He’d love to meet you – he saw your picture in my list of Facebook friends and says you have a lovely smile.”

Perhaps more astonishingly, a couple of guys from the dating website have – and I have no idea how – somehow tracked me down on Facebook, and are sending me messages. And in the last few weeks, I keep on receiving unsolicited “pokes” and friend requests from people I don’t even know – they see your profile in different groups and try to befriend you.

There’s nothing wrong with any of this: I ignore the creepy ones, message/flirt with the ones I think are fun, meet the ones I find interesting – and don’t accept friend invitations from people who are not my friends! But somehow, the casualness and familiarity that results from conducting your life from the end of a computer is spilling over into real, physical interaction. And actually, I rather enjoy it. I choose not to restrict my profile on Facebook; anything I have to hide, I simply don’t share it… and I rather like the idea of being seen. I like people being direct and forward, and although it’s a bit creepy that people I don’t know have checked out my profile – and admitted it to me! – before approaching me, I have to admit, I kind of like it.

Similarly with the blog: this is a creative outlet for me, and I have only shared the address with my friend J (recently-alluded to male platonic friend, upon whom I have bestowed the dubious honour of being my unofficial dating advisor; he has witnessed my greatest neuroses, and I figured there are thus no further secrets from him; he may as well read the bloody blog). Although most of the readers don’t know me, I still control what I share about my life (this is only a projected fraction); I choose not to share particularly difficult issues until they have been resolved, and out of respect, I protect the identities of, and don’t overtly share information about, the people I really care for (um, oh dear, apart from my mum and Evil Bitch Sisters). But there’s still something that delights me about the voyeuristic aspect of sharing some of my self, my thoughts and my life on this blog.

Facebook is unnecessarily feared and ridiculed by too many people. It is what you want it to be: a bit of fun and a way to keep in touch with lots of people at once (which is what it is to me) or – to some of my friends with high profile jobs – a bit of career publicity/propaganda. You can be as private or as public as you wish, and share or hide whichever information you wish. And indeed by watched by people you wish…

Oh, and that guy I bumped into at A’s party? Great guy. Witty, intelligent, charming, lots of opinions to share and stories to tell, fun, ambitious, attractive, confident, direct, persistent, etc… dammit, he’s only another bloody right-wing lawyer with offensive, xenophobic views on immigration, desperately seeking a Stepford wife.

Next!



07 July 2007

Questions To Ponder Over


How do you distinguish between genuineness and sincerity on the one hand, and bullshitting and fuckwittery on the other?

How can you be sure that the lovely things that are said to you come from the heart, and are true and real – and not being fed to other people at the same time?

Do you carry on looking for something if you’ve already found it; and when the results of that search repeatedly reinforce your gut feeling?

Which is worse: to take a leap of faith because your heart, head, mind and gut tell you to – and these end up being wrong and you get hurt? Or to put up the barriers, run away and risk losing the most significant, rewarding and irreplaceable opportunity of your life?

How can you be sure that while you sit pondering, someone else is not benefiting from the very thing you desperately want and are holding out for? How can you be sure that the opportunity that could be on its way to you will not be diverted to someone else because it was never meant for you in the first place?

What happens if you wait for something that is being sent to you and it gets lost in transit and never finds you, either because it no longer wants to, or because someone else has stolen it?

I consider myself to be a very good judge of character, and my gut feelings never fail me… but I’m absolutely petrified.

03 July 2007

On Blair and Brown



Irritatingly, the thoughts I wrote on Tony Blair’s departure and Gordon Brown’s leadership have vanished into cyberspace, and no, I didn’t back it up, and yes, I am a fool for not doing so.

Here are a few hastily reconstructed and crudely paraphrased points instead:

A bizarre, seemingly pointless and poorly written article appeared in the Sunday Times a couple of weeks ago by an outspoken critic of Blair (his name momentarily escapes me), basically saying that Blair’s dealings in Iraq etc were unforgivable and will overshadow his achievements, but hey, he smiled a lot, introduced Cool Britannia (if fleetingly) and engineered a new governmental trend in spin over substance (actually, I think that was Peter Mandelson in the ‘80s, but whatever), plus his almost evangelical belief that he was carrying out the will of God in Iraq was touching. And for that reason alone, isn’t Tony Blair a lovely man?!

I spent ages thinking about this, and – once I had stopped fuming and ranting – had to concede that I don’t entirely disagree with this, as uncomfortable as it makes me feel. However, I think that this is more indicative of how shallow our culture has become than it is testament to the greatness of Tony Blair.

I vividly remember the 1997 General Election. I stayed up all night watching it on TV with my cousin, and dancing round the flat at 6am when the Blairs arrived at Number 10, belting out D:ream’s Things Can Only Get Better, as my cousin sat sulking and chain smoking (he is a Tory, unfortunately), and those scenes really sum it up for me. We were always waiting for things to get better, and they kind of did, in the sense that Labour’s victory after 18 years of Tory government brought with it euphoria, optimism and promises of renewal and change. We had a handsome, young, cool new leader who used to have long hair and play in a rock band and who invited Noel Gallagher to Downing Street. Everything was about the “people”, and we somehow neglected to notice that behind the soundbites (remember “Education, Education, Education” anyone?) there was very little substance.

XXX

I ALWAYS say this, but I think that 1997 was a very interesting year culturally. Significant changes were coming about: in journalism, a new discourse was emerging, in which journalists turned their writing inwards and started writing about their lives (John Diamond writing about his battle with cancer in the Times on Saturday; Ruth Picardie writing a similar article in the Observer; Helen Fielding in the Independent – a column which was later developed into Bridget Jones’s Diary). Our growing interest in other people’s lives was displayed in the (then) astonishing scenes of mass public mourning following the death of Diana, Princess of Wales. Ten years on, we have become so media and PR savvy that it would be inconceivable now for the Royals to be so unprepared for such a reaction. Our interest in other people’s lives has grown to such an extent that our lives are practically one big reality TV programme. Everyone is a celebrity. Heat Magazine and Big Brother are only part of it. It’s all about the outer face rather than the inner substance. And perhaps that is why – even after Iraq – our enduring memory of Tony Blair is of his smiling face and he will be remembered fondly by a lot of people.

XXX

Gordon Brown is a different man, and I suspect one of more substance. Let’s see what his leadership brings.

_____

Addendum: I have been sitting in a coffee shop writing this, and had to leave hastily to use the loo in an adjacent bookshop, as someone was caught shooting up in the bathroom here (even Starbucks is not immune from insalubrious activity!). As I scrambled up the stairs en route to the bathroom in the bookshop in embladdered discomfort (breaking a toenail in the process – it really hurts, and I will now have to find alternative footwear to the strappy sandals I had intended to wear to Henley on Saturday), I stumbled upon a new biography, entitled something like “Gordon Brown: Prime Minister”. See? The man hasn’t even been in power for a week, and we already can’t get enough of his private life.

28 June 2007

Insomnia


We are praying for something else now; have become something else ourselves. For even at the point at which it all falls apart, when the battle is lost, when our fate is sealed, when the wound is fresh and we already know we will bear the scars forever- even then – we cannot help but hope.

There are no words, she says, and proceeds to fill the room with words, talking endlessly. The words rise up out of her and fill the room. They break away from each other and dissolve into nothingness. They circle me, strangle me. She speaks for me so I don’t have to, and I am grateful for her words.

Now, as then, what I feel cannot be expressed in language. It is a look, a touch, a curiosity, a desire, a warmth, an understanding, a gut feeling. There are no words for me any more; I don’t know how to put them back together, need the comfort still of their barrier.

Speak

I can’t.

26 June 2007

Blair's Legacy

To follow shortly. My evil new laptop is rebelling against me in that blood-pressure elevating manner that can only be the work of modern technology. I am working on it... we can't let our Tone step down from office without passing comment... and judgment.

D x

Coming Soon...


In a somewhat grotesque parody of a popular American TV sitcom, I shall shortly be launching a spin-off blog from The Girls Online. It will focus on my experience as a Jewish singleton living in London. Yes, I KNOW I seem like an unlikely authority on this subject; my relationship history may as well be renamed a non-relationship history, I am the most cynical, unromantic and commitment-phobic girl I know, and following my recent 5-minute foray into internet dating, have called off the search and closed my window.

However, what I do have, aside from nearly 20 years of dating experiences and many tales – some amusing, some tragic – is an insatiable interest in and curiosity about the world and the people around me. Each person and experience in my life has (I hope) taught me something new and forced me to examine my own identity: as a woman, as a Jew, as a friend, a lover, a sexual being and a thinking person.

The new blog will examine some of these issues further, and will also explore other themes. Can women “have it all”? (short answer – no) Why, when I am so good at forming and maintaining relationships in general (it has been my key strength in my career for example) am I so incapable of having a serious relationship with a man? What internal identity struggles are forced to the surface by the whole (non-?)Jewish dating scene? How much of where we end up in our lives – and specifically with whom we end up – is down to social pressure and sheer fear of being “alone”?

And, in a fun twist, I have persuaded (bullied?!) a male friend to share the blog space with me, in an attempt to balance out the viewpoints. For as I said to someone last week, I’m not one for crude categorisations, and I rally against arguments based on biological essentialism, but honestly, sometimes, when it comes to men being a complete mystery to me, the evidence is sometimes overwhelming…

Watch this space.

24 June 2007

Birthday Brunch and Postmodern Identity Crisis



I am running down the rain-soaked streets, destroying the bottoms of my Juicy tracksuit (why is it they never drag on the pavement when it’s not raining heavily?). I am late, although thankfully, for the first Sunday in weeks, not hungover. The doormen swing open the heavy doors, and I stumble into the Wolseley and stand at the entrance, dripping wet and trying to catch my breath. From the middle of the room, Evil Bitch Sister No 1 (EBS 1) is glaring disapprovingly at my umbrella (captioned heavily with the words “Groovy Chick”) and looking as though she wants to kill me. We are here to celebrate my mother’s birthday.

“D!” trills my mother. “How lovely of you to finally join us!” The false jollity is a transparent dig at my timekeeping. "Let me look at you – I was beginning to forget what you look like, hahaha." (Note: I recently conducted an experiment to prove that, contrary to her perception, she is the one who never calls me, and if I neglect to call her for a couple of weeks, we will not be in touch at all. It has clearly backfired on me now.)

“You’re looking so much healthier,” she continues. “You were looking very gaunt earlier this year, and I was desperately worried. Now you look more… robust [ie you’re getting fat again] and you’ve got your colour back” [ie sunburned from runs in Regent’s Park]. I knew it! My thighs are ballooning!

EBS 1 smirks triumphantly behind her carrot juice, but says nothing: she is in a rare good mood at the moment, having successfully managed to manipulate and extort money out of my mother to buy a flat in West Hampstead.

I bury my head in the overpriced menu, wondering how – in a macrobiotic-friendly restaurant – I am still unable to find anything suitable to eat. I am already hot with irritation, and I remove my Juicy jacket to reveal a Little Miss Naughty T-Shirt. EBS 1 and EBS 2 squirm with embarrassment. “You look ridiculous,” hisses EBS 1. “You’re far too old to get away with that top,” says EBS 2. My mother looks despairingly at me. “Oh! You have some white hairs!” she exclaims, patting her immaculate blonde bob, as several people on surrounding tables look over to examine the growing visible signs of my aging process.

My mother is one of those irritating people who has never smoked and doesn’t drink, rarely exercises, has a largely stress-free lifestyle, still enjoys biscuits late at night, but has never had cellulite, and with the right make-up, can still pass for 47. She is 62. Unfortunately, I take after my father, who smoked 40 cigarettes a day, was an outrageous workaholic, lived on about 3 hours sleep a night and constantly over-committed himself to different causes. He was once mistaken for a pensioner by a pharmacist when he was still in his 40s.

“Now listen, D,” she continues, and I can tell from her tone that she is on a mission. The object of her last mission broke my heart, and she has been warned repeatedly to abandon her matchmaking attempts.

“I spoke to Auntie D last week, and she couldn’t believe that you live round the corner from her and still haven’t been round to them for dinner! She’d like you to come next Friday night. There’ll be lots of nice young people there!” EBS 2 makes funny faces at me in between bites of pain au chocolat. We all know what “nice young people” means, and she is grateful to have escaped from my mother’s latest matchmaking mission.

The mere mention of Auntie D is enough to induce a panic attack in me. Pushing 80, the woman is a walking warning against surgical intervention. The skin on her face is so tightly stretched, it is a wonder she can still talk; in fact she has such a prohibitive lisp, it is hard to understand a word she says, although her voice is certainly loud enough. Her yellow bouffant hair is more visible than the sun on a clear, bright day, her inch-thick make-up is so exaggerated that I would not be surprised if she were outed as a transvestite, and her intoxicating perfume poses more threat to the environment than any inland carbon footprinted aeroplane journey. My memories of family get-togethers are tainted not only with her presence, but with her insistence on informing me and everyone else present that I was very fat and needed to lose weight. Apparently now I am thin enough to merit a place at her dinner table, where I will inevitably be presented to a panel of (in)eligible Jewish bachelors.

This time, I don’t have the energy to fight my mum on this one. My dating website experiences as well as my mum’s attempts to marry me off make me think of what Jacqueline Rose wrote in the introduction to her brilliant book, States of Fantasy. I often think of this: she referred to the postmodern identity crisis; belonging “everywhere and nowhere at the same time”. This is how I feel. I know on paper I’m a “nice Jewish girl” (as long as I have edited certain details on that paper, hahaha!), but the suburban sell-out dream that will be waiting for me at Auntie D’s Friday night dinner table will just not do it for me.

It’s a funny place to be. I have just fought my way through the most difficult 6 months of my life, and have come through intact: a little bruised and still cynical, but stronger, self-confidence intact, still optimistic and still curious and excited about life, grateful for the many relationships in my life and all the opportunities I am fortunate to have. I have learned an enormous amount about myself over the last 6 months. I am looking forward to starting my new job on Tuesday. Everything is falling into place. I belong everywhere…

…and yet I also belong nowhere.

23 June 2007

Fragments and Perspectives


I am very nervous about posting this item. It is taken from the novel I am writing. I would be interested to hear readers' feedback (thegirlsonline@gmail.com).

__________________


Where there is language there is often silence, and where no words are spoken, a thousand meanings resonate. Mixed meanings, sometimes. Misunderstandings.

There were no expectations, no over-hyped anticipation, just a feeling, a knowing, like the time I was summoned to The House, and I knew the announcement before it was made. I had sat down in the annex and written it, written my response, purged it from my system. So I was calm. And when we came face to face, we continued from where we had left off, which was nowhere – and yet everywhere. Like the announcement, like The Pond, like standing on the balcony in Israel: it was meant to be, and it was part of me. It was an oceanic feeling, and it was like the ocean; vast, clear, natural, sparkling, and just there. But hidden beneath, there is a destructive anger that can consume and kill and leave you helpless and drowning.

The words in The Rooms are all the same. We share the same Story, the same history, but the contexts differ. Although I am silent, my story is spoken for me in The Rooms.

My context is The Pond.

I experience my hunger now as something beyond a physical presence. I carry it inside me. It is there in my heart, scratching the wound that has not yet healed. It is there when I wake, there when I sleep, when I walk, talk, think, breathe… it is an ache, a yearning, a desire, and it engulfs me completely. It comes from the place in which I store my memories, my language, the feelings associated with that time. It is my temps perdu, and it has returned to haunt me.

She is emphatic: The soul does not leave the body until after the death. I don’t believe her, though. I know that we received an unspoken message beside The Pond.

It was beside The Pond that she took my hands, looked deep into my eyes and promised me that it wouldn’t happen. It did. 3 weeks later. It was driving alongside The Pond that I threw a lit cigarette out the window and it missed and lay on the back seat of the car, burning a hole in the upholstery, and I panicked and turned around and forgot to steer and almost crashed the car. Another time, I was driving past The Pond, circling restlessly because I hadn’t heard any news, and she called me and told me that it might happen, it might just happen, and she couldn’t bear to speak the words; her voice was barely a whisper and when I made her repeat them, she shouted them out. The words bounced off the surface off The Pond, like a painful bellyflop, and slapped me in the face. I nearly crashed the car that time too.

I want to be you, I think. I want to inhabit your body and your soul. I want to be in your life and to be your life.

Always a drama, by The Pond. When we were undercover, trying to be inconspicuous, and they found us and took us away, the sirens blaring. In the storm, navigating our way around in bare feet with no umbrella.

When he pulls me close to him, the outside world melts away. There is no sense of time, of past, present or future, no loss, no pain, no lack, no hunger, nothing to purge. There is only the here and now of the embrace. I am light, unburdened, unencumbered. As in the hospital room, nothing else exists; nothing else matters. This is all there is. Just… this.

The Pond is my link to the past, I think. Water is another transcendental element. Natural, powerful, flowing. It washes away. It extinguishes my fire. It can drown…

I have left my body. My soul is somewhere else. The hunger is now nausea, like an abjection waiting to happen, that I cannot control, that does not happen somehow. I cannot feel my body; neither sexually, nor physically; neither as too much, nor too little. It is melting away, but without my knowledge or consciousness. It is changing; I am changing.

22 June 2007

Cynicism and Hope


Big shout goes out to my (male, platonic) friend J, who I am sure will still be on a break from his billable hours reading this blog by the time I publish this note. I emphasise the platonic quality (much to his amusement, I'm sure) as this seems to be the only type of male relationship I can manage (although ironically, we were mistaken for a couple last night - I am still giggling about that!).


I do cherish the ever-dwindling pool of platonic male friends in my life who have not sold out to the NW London suburban dream (or who at least feel guilty and ambivalent about it if they have!) and who struggle to reconcile their successful careers with their desire for intellectual and moral integrity. Few men I know would "get" some of the items we publish on this blog, and if I were to meet a man I thought would be able to understand, chances are I would be very, very interested in him, and would be too petrified to open myself up to the extent that I would share the blog with him.


These platonic male friends are great. As I said to J just now, being friends with him definitely helps me to understand men, because I can see how men can have all these great qualities (above), yet be just a little less sorted when it comes to women - and that doesn't make them bastards. And the rest of them - as Saab Man proves - are probably gay. Or involved with someone else.


Our lives didn't become more complicated, F. Years of experience and knocks have eroded our innocence and turned us into cynics.


I'm kind of still secretly harbouring a certain fantasy, though...

21 June 2007

Revelations


Saab man is gay. But he also indulges in "recreational straight snogging." As D had cause to sigh only a few weeks ago, since when did our lives get so complicated? His jacket is still on the floor of my office, awaiting our next meeting...

20 June 2007

I'm So Sad...


... I really am. I have just spent the last two and a half hours writing notes and a whole bloody essay on an art exhibition, which not only will no one read, but for which I won't even be rewarded a grade! And this was meant to be a day of relaxation for me!


I need a stiff drink. Now. Which I can't have, as I'm on another detox.

A Bit of Kulcha


Today, I engaged in a cultural activity that did not involve my usual (academic, you understand) analysis of how the High Street has interpreted the latest catwalk fashions. I took myself off to the Tate Britain, to see the How We Are: Photographing Britain exhibition.

The exhibition itself was very patchy; some of it was very carelessly put together, parts of it bordered on social offensiveness (in terms both of what it omitted and what it chose to include out of political correctness), and some of it was outstandingly wonderful. My cultural outing was marred only by a sweaty man with terrible body odour and halitosis, who kept getting too close and breathing heavily on me, and having to be ushered outside for half an hour when the fire alarm went off. (I find fire alarms really bloody irritating. I always refuse to leave my desk at work during fire drills, and once, the office services manager had to forcibly remove me from the building, because I was trying to close a deal with a client who was about to go on his honeymoon and I thought the contract was more important than standing in the street, while self-important jobsworths paced up and down in fluorescent yellow waistcoats (in broad daylight!) barking orders. But anyway, I digress.)

I adore photography, which has rightfully earned respect as a form of art in itself, as well as serving as integral historical documentary and an important journalistic form. I did feel that the exhibition could have made more of this. Focusing chronologically from 1840 until the present day, I thought that the era divisions were a little random. The first part of the exhibition seemed to look more at early photographic technologies and themes, and it only became more socially, politically and culturally exploratory later on.

Its opening claims that “[t]he unique story of British photography exposes a strong social conscience, a love of the ordinary, an intense curiosity and the constant need to record” were overblown and over-generalised: doesn’t all photography necessarily do this?? I also found the idea that the photography represented “a constantly shifting notion of British identity” bordering on offensive. First of all, the only Britishness in the exhibition seemed to be Englishness(!) and secondly, I didn’t feel that the exhibition explored this theme enough. In many ways, much of the exhibition had been thrown together randomly.

In 2 of the sections, the explanatory blurb boasted of the proliferation of women photographers very early on, which was pointless and patronising. If they were trying to make a statement about how inclusive of minorities they are (after the “Britishness” gaffe), they failed miserably: to include a mere 3 photographs of the Suffragettes, one of the most politically and socially significant political movements in Britain (none of which included iconic images of women chaining themselves to railings!) in the 20th century, was an absolute travesty.

I have taken pages of notes, which are very boring to read, so here are a few of my thematic highlights (I am glossing over photographic postcards, and themes of gardening, cookery, the countryside and natural history, all of which I find crashingly boring):

1. Images of celebrities and royalty. I love portraits. One of my favourite spaces is the National Portrait Gallery, where I am known to indulge my obsession with Tudor history and can spend hours staring at portraits of King Henry VIII and Queen Elizabeth I. I am fascinated by the 3-way interaction between the viewer, the artist and the subject, as well as the propaganda aspect and constant shift of religious values. Portraits in this exhibition included a collection of portraits of Queen Victoria, portraying her variously as wife, mother and monarch.


2. The portrayals of the “little people”, banding together to fight, in their own small ways, for social change. There was a great collection of photographs published in New Left Review from Humphrey Spender (1936), of the Jarrow Marchers, a group of 207 men, who marched to Parliament from North-East England to demonstrate against poverty and unemployment.


3. How photography, perhaps more than any other art, can simultaneously convey the dichotomous relationship between poverty and affluence and show war and glamour almost comfortably co-existing in one single still.


4. Playing around with different notions of nationhood. This was more implied than explicitly shown (but what would you expect from an exhibition of Britain that only looks at England?). I really enjoyed the snapshots of early-mid 1950s life in Bethnal Green (Nigel Henderson), of mid-late 1960s Notting Hill (Charlie Phillips) and Roger Mayne’s Southam Street collection (1957-ish), showing the shifting cultural diversity on Britain (specifically London!)’s streets.


5. Fashion and style! Yes, I have a particular interest in this, but actually, it reveals a lot about progressive culture, particularly post-WW2. I loved Norman Parkinson’s collection of beautifully dressed models, theatrically posing against a backdrop of the city (Fashion and the City – 2 of my greatest loves!) and Derek Ridger’s portrayal of the new wave of London clubbers, looking at Punks and New Romantics. (But where were Vivienne Westwood and Malcolm MacLaren in all of this??! – another weakness of the exhibition). There was also some work by Jason Evans; a shoot entitled “Strictly”, which appeared in i-D Magazine in 1991. Styled by Simon Foxton, it showcased a collection of macho streetwear, which was also very effeminate, and was modelled by black men, in an attempt to break stereotypes.


6. The political consciousness, anger and social rage of the 1970s (which I could happily and wistfully talk about for hours – oh what has happened to us?) There was also a shift in form and representation (which I won’t go into here), and a lot of the photography turned from documentary to satire, where “Britishness” was cariacatured. I found the most powerful and moving images in the little detail (and this I particularly enjoyed because of my strong interest in other people):


· Nancy Hellebrand’s images of random Londoners in their (mostly squalid) homes (ps, the “Britishness” was very London-centric);


· Chris Killip’s portrayal of the effects of economic decline on the people of North-East England


· Homer Sykes had produced some excellent images which played around with themes of representation; his images included accidental participants and spectators to the central image – brilliant


· Martin Parr’s colourful satire on the attitudes and aspirations of the English middle classes – I loved the self-awareness and problematising of the fact that he had benefited from the very political order he opposed (don’t we all struggle with that but do nothing about it?)


7. Significant social changes and Thatcher-hating in the 1980s


· A couple of excellent Anna Fox images were used, looking at office workers around 1987. Apart from the ghastly hairstyles, fashions and brick-sized mobile phones, one image showed the reception area of one office with a picture of Maggie hanging on the wall behind them. It was creepily Stalinesque, and also kind of reminded me of the excessive Sadaam imagery in Iraq. Also, another image of yuppies stuffing themselves with rich, fatty food


· Aspirational “Britain” – in this case Romford, Essex, around the time of the “Right to Buy” council-owned homes policy


· Greenham Common…


8. The final part of the exhibition, focusing on the 1990s until the present day (when, interestingly, the commercial aspect of photography as a genre has largely given way to the acceptance of photography as a valid and respected art form – again, sloppily compiled – included some powerful images:


· Chris Harrison’s postmodern images of WW1 memorials in contemporary surroundings, eg outside a large Tesco store. Yes, it’s vulgar, but it’s also modern, and represents change, movement, modernity, the cycle of life, the future, rebuilding, a shared history and future, etc, as well as being representative of (at least) London architecture


· Penny Klepuszewska’s “Living Arrangements”. God, I found this so moving. 4 images, showing simple, everyday objects belonging to elderly people, against a dark background, eg one of those old-fashioned handbags old women always carry, or an old-fashioned radio or a blanket. Intended to address loneliness and bereavement in old age, it also reminded me of those heart-breaking Holocaust images of piles of people’s abandoned and very personal possessions, like shoes or glasses, or carefully labelled suitcases.


· Albrecht Tuebke’s collection of images of random citizens of London. Not images of stereotypes or people who blend into the background, but some of the more eccentrically dressed and interesting-looking people one finds in London (usually harassing you on the Underground).

Finally (if anyone can still be bothered to read on), the Tate Britain invites members of the public to contribute their own images to the exhibition (how fabulously postmodern, darling!), under the theme of portraiture, landscape, still life or documentary.

I am going to think about what image I could contribute…

18 June 2007

I'm Getting a Grip...


Overheard: a conversation between a man and woman (friends or siblings, I decided), while sitting outside Fresh and Wild in Camden this weekend, enjoying the fleeting sunshine. The woman has been moaning at some length about her boyfriend’s inability to commit.

Man: Well, I think that the majority of people in relationships just… kind of… drift. They don’t want to think about where it’s going; they just want to live in the moment, because it’s easier to carry on without engaging in scary questions about the future:

Woman, clearly still harbouring utopian fantasies about living happily ever after with her boyfriend, mumbles something in protest.


Man: I think that the population is divided 70-30. There are those 30% of people who know what they want, and are absolutely sure that they want to be with their partners for life [PS, I interject here, to add that my friend I thinks it’s more like 5%. Personally, I think it would be a miracle if that figure was even 1%.] The other 70% simply don’t know what they want and are just in the relationship because carrying on is easier than questioning it and opting out.

Woman looks like she is about to faint. Ever the cynic, I suppress a smug smile as I carry on eating my sunflower seeds, and squint at them behind my oversized sunglasses.

Woman: But you’re in a serious, committed relationship. You’re in the 30% surely…

Man: I change my mind all the time. I can be in the car and I’ll turn one corner and think “yes, I definitely want to marry her and have children with her”, and then I’ll turn another corner and think “no, it’ll never last”. But it’s too much headf*ck to think about it too deeply, so I just carry on in the relationship, not sure where it’s going or whether I actually want to be with her.

________________________________________________

And you know what, Girls? I don’t find this jaded or depressing. I think this is normal. People don’t know what they want, and that’s fine. We all have issues, and a bit of headf*ck and confusion is fine by me. One certainly doesn’t reach one’s 30s without having “issues” (just ask my analyst, hahaha). I don’t believe the perfect person or the perfect relationship exists, but I believe that occasionally, someone a bit special may come along, for whom – for some inexplicable reason - you’re willing to suspend your cynicism and commitmentphobia and make a go of it. I’m not prepared to do it for just anyone (hence removing myself from the dating website and the dating scene in general), but I know when someone special has walked into my life. And until (or, indeed, if ever) he decides to get a grip, I am going to invest in the people who may be exasperated by me sometimes, but who love and adore me unequivocally and are prepared to invest in me: my Girls!